Categories
Political science

In a 1-2 page SINGLE SPACED (750-1250 words) essay, answer the following questio

In a 1-2 page SINGLE SPACED (750-1250 words) essay, answer the following question: One of the central challenges of using history to understand the present (and as a guide for actions in the future) is that of contemplating what remains the same over time, and what is different because of changes in context.
“The Siege of Sarajevo” played out over the course of almost 4 years from 1992-1996; well before the widespread use of the Internet or cell phones. What can we learn from studying that case? If it were to happen today, what continuities would we expect to see and what differences might be expected given the changes in the information environment in the 3 decades that have passed since Sarajevo? Considering your answer, what lessons can we take away for future warfare?

Categories
Political science

Help me answer these 7 questions. 1. Give an example of how the concept of libe

Help me answer these 7 questions.
1. Give an example of how the concept of liberty impacts public policy.
2. Discuss one way that you think about security in public policy.
3. Give a symbol that is used in public policy. What does that symbol mean? How is it used?
4. Choose a policy issue and present the causes of the issue in two different models. How does the choice of causes impact the understanding of policy?
5. What are examples of incentives in public policy?
6. Explain the challenge in American politics to facts. Why do you think this happens?
7. How can we apply the concept of power to a polity? What are challenges of power?
the book I attached below in the files will help you answer the questions.

Categories
Political science

What is Federalism and how does the U.S. Constitution allocate powers to both th

What is Federalism and how does the U.S. Constitution allocate powers to both the national and state governments in order to create a federalist system in the United States?
150-200 words
No plagiarism should be found
please answer in VERY SIMLE LANGUAGE

Categories
Political science

Discussion: How do Parties Affect the Constitutional system? 5050 unread replies

Discussion: How do Parties Affect the Constitutional system?
5050 unread replies.5050 replies.
As you may have already noticed, the Constitution was not written with Political Parties in mind. Whether it is intentional or an oversight, there is nothing in the Constitution that assumes political parties would exist. While Madison would argue in Federalist #10 that factions existed, it was assumed that the Constitution as written would prevent any one faction from becoming too powerful. (Madison would later become a big proponent and organizer of the Democratic-Republicans). Instead, the Constitution is based on the Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances, believing that the competition between the three branches would protect against tyranny. Parties, however, can transcend these boundaries, putting members of the same party in all three branches and giving them near-total control.
In what way do you think that Parties affect the way the Constitution is supposed to work? Is it a hindrance to Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances, or does it help in some way?
You will be graded on the following:
You have provided accurate, factual answers or you have properly supported your arguments.
You have thoroughly or completely answered the questions.
You have thoroughly engaged or interacted with your fellow students or the instructor, by replying to other student’s post, responding to questions or statements in reply to your posts, or any questions asked by the instructor.

Categories
Political science

Discussion: Democracy in the United States Round 2 No unread replies.No replies.

Discussion: Democracy in the United States Round 2
No unread replies.No replies.
We looked at couple of definitions of democracy in the earlier discussion. However, just because something meets the strict definition does not mean we cannot look at it more deeply.
Take the first definition of democracy we saw: rule by the people/the many. Think about what it means to say that somebody “rules.” In a Kingdom, the King is seen as having power. In an aristocracy, we say the few rule. So what does it mean to say that the people rule? What would a country like that look like?
Taking what you have learned about Civil Liberties, Rights, Democracy, Parties, Interest Groups, and Elections try and answer the following questions with your fellow students.
Create your own definition of “democracy.” Consider what you would include and not include as important criteria for democracy. In other words, what do you mean when you say “democracy?”
Using your own criteria of what constitutes a Democracy, does the United States meet this criteria?
If your answer is yes, be sure to provide evidence that this is the case. If your answer is now, be sure to provide evidence that this is the case. In both cases, what would you suggested would be needed to make it more democratic.
You will be graded on the following:
You have provided accurate, factual answers or you have properly supported your arguments.
You have thoroughly or completely answered the questions.
You have thoroughly engaged or interacted with your fellow students or the instructor, by replying to other student’s post, responding to questions or statements in reply to your posts, or any questions asked by the instructor.

Categories
Political science

Review the reading and answer the questions in the documents Approaches to study

Review the reading and answer the questions in the documents
Approaches to studying Comparative Politics
APPROACHES IN COMPARATIVE POLITICSHenry Brady & David Collier (eds.). 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 11-200 (e-book, UNR).
Mark Lichbach. 2003. Is Rational Choice Theory All of Social Science? University of Michigan Press, Chapters 3-6 (e-book, UNR).
Peter Hall & Rosemary Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44.4: 936-957.

Categories
Political science

Are multinational corporations the tools of states (realism), or are states the

Are multinational corporations the tools of states (realism), or are states the tools or multinational corporations (critical view)? Which view better explains the world as we see it today? Defend your position with contemporary or historical facts.
Respond with a minimum of 500 words.

Categories
Political science

Are multinational corporations the tools of states (realism), or are states the

Are multinational corporations the tools of states (realism), or are states the tools or multinational corporations (critical view)? Which view better explains the world as we see it today? Defend your position with contemporary or historical facts. Post your essay no later than midnight on February 4.
Respond to the postings of a least two other students, one from each of the two threads, no later than midnight on February 6. What are the strengths and shortcomings of the other students’ arguments? How could their arguments be strengthened
Realism
If you believe that MNCs are the tools of states, explain why by posting an essay in this thread.
Critical Theory
If you believe that states are the tools of MNCs, explain why by posting an essay in this thread.
Please follow my professors instructions 800-1000 words

Categories
Political science

Hi! I have to write an essay comparing and contrast proetheanism and survialism.

Hi! I have to write an essay comparing and contrast proetheanism and survialism. Please read the instruction in its entirity. I live in the United States and hoping for someone who has English as their first language to complete this as I am expecting strong vocabulary. DO NOT USE OUTSIDE RESOURCES ONLY THE ARTICLES I HAVE GIVEN YOU. PLEASE LOOK AT THE BOOK CHAPTERS FIRST AND UTILIZE THESE!!!

Categories
Political science

Pick a policy and write about it. Here is the rubric: Policy Problems Guidelines

Pick a policy and write about it. Here is the rubric:
Policy Problems Guidelines
The purpose of this paper is to identify how a policy came into being. Write as if you are explaining the history of a policy, and how the problem got defined.
-Use Stone’s articulation of how we define problems
-When did this policy get enacted?
-When did the problem begin to exist?
-Who are the big actors in the policy process?
-What is the context for the policy?
-What were the competing interests of the problem?
-What is the history of the issue? When did the issue arise? Has this been a back burner issue or always present?
-How is the issue presented? How might different groups define the problem?
-What is the name of the policy? Is there a shorter name for the policy or did it receive a name from the public ie Amy’s law?
– What level of government does the problem reside? What level of policy is this local, state or federal?
-What type of policy is it? Is it regulatory, distributive, or redistributive? Is it symbolic or substantive?
-Does the policy suggest particular oversight? Does the policy discuss how it will be evaluated? Does the policy allocate money? Does it have a sunset clause?
-Include relevant information, but limit your scope of information. You have to continually ask yourself, is this a NEED to know piece of information, or just interesting to know.
-For research look in newspapers, legislator websites, government documents, policy journals, and official documents for organizations (Interest groups)
-Formal information: This paper will be 5 pages long, double spaced in 12pt Times New Roman font with one-inch margins.